Category Archives: Causerants

KFC Shows They Don’t Give a Cluck. This Time with Juvenile Diabetes

I just can’t understand what Kentucky Fried Chicken is thinking with its latest cause marketing program. This picture says it all. Buy a HALF-GALLON of soda – with 800 calories from 56 spoonfuls of sugar – for $2.99 and a buck goes to Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.

I’m actually more astonished that JDRF would sign on for such a pact. KFC showed it’s a bird of a different feather last year with Buckets for the Cure and the dreadful Double Down. It’s no surprise to me that they deep fried their reputation again, covering it with a disgusting, unappealing exterior that few can digest.

But JDRF should have known better. I Googled the partnership and some Dallas KFC’s were selling JDRF’s signature sneaker pinups, which seems a more appropriate venture as it’s not directly connected to KFC’s menu.

I’ve said this before: I don’t have a problem with nonprofits and fast-serve chains doing cause marketing. What I do have a problem with is when fast serve chains like KFC encourage consumers to buy products that directly contribute to the health conditions – in this case diabetes – they are supposedly trying to prevent by partnering with the cause in the first place.

It’s like if Philip Morris partnered with Smokey the Bear and donated a portion of all cigarette sales to conservation groups working to stop wildfires – fires that are sometimes started by careless smokers!

It’s simply that ridiculous!

What was JDRF thinking? I’m not sure, but I’m calling them today to see if I can find out!

[Update 6/11/11: JDRF emailed me a response to my blog post and gave me permission to post it on my blog. See the comments section.]

Is Cause Marketing Really a Disaster After Disasters?

No sooner had the ground stopped shaking in Japan last week and people were already shaking their fists calling for a moratorium on cause marketing. It happens after every disaster (the last being after the earthquake in Haiti).

I’m not saying that these calls for pause weren’t uncalled for. I’m just wondering whether cause marketing is really a disaster after disasters, or are people being overly sensitive or maybe even hurting they want to help.

Let’s begin with the definition of cause marketing. You might be familiar with mine: Cause marketing is a partnership between a nonprofit and for-profit for mutual profit. The nonprofit “profits” from the visibility and dollars raised while the for-profit benefits from increased consumer favorability which may drive sales.

I agree with Mom101 that post-disaster is no time for marketing ploys. Of course, this begs the question if there is ever a time for opportunism when it comes to cause marketing and raising money to support good causes.

Next, you have to look at just what type of cause marketing a company might use to help quake victims. Is there one type that might be better than another?

Point of Sale - A chain mobilizes its storefronts to ask customers to donate to agencies that are helping quake victims. 100% of the money goes right to these nonprofits; the company is merely a pass through. The company may even choose to match a portion or all of the donations. It’s hard to argue against this type of cause marketing.

Purchase Triggered Donations - You designate a product or service from which up to 100% is donated to quake relief. I could see consumers frowning on this one, especially if it was less than 100%. If Starbucks said they were donating all the money they made in their U. S.  stores from 8 to 9am on one weekday, would you think less of them? Would you complain that they should just donate the money instead of using cause marketing, even if it heightened the need to give to quake victims?

Message Promotion – What if Target took a piece of its advertising budget and devoted it to ads telling consumers how they could support the Red Cross’ efforts in Japan. Is there no place for that type of cause marketing as well? This extends to digital cause marketing too. What if Toyota put its Facebook page to work promoting the Japan Earthquake page so people could stay informed and engaged.

Employees Engagement - Building off of Help Attack! which I talked about last week, aircraft maker Boeing could set aside one million dollars for the Red Cross so employees that sign up for the social giving service can tweet and Facebook for the victims.

I think there are some good ways that cause marketing could be helpful immediately after disasters. I also don’t think people are aware of all the different ways cause marketing could aid a relief effort.

Of course, cause marketing needs to be done tactfully, senstively in light of the circumstances. An added bonus might be that while plenty of money will naturally pour into relief agencies in the immediate days following a disaster, cause marketing might just be the engine that sustains the momentum of giving.

Whether it’s after a disaster or in the ongoing fight against cancer, cause marketing should never be viewed as having “strings attached.” Why can’t it be a lifeline instead?

What do you think?

Groupon’s Fumble Gives Causes Chance to Score Big

Enough people have registered their opinion to confirm this deal-breaker for everyone: Groupon’s Superbowl ads Sunday night were ill-conceived and offensive. Goodwill earned from this promotion: 0%.

As of this printing, Groupon should have apologized (they haven’t), pulled the ads (saw one last night), fired their agency (standing shoulder to shoulder) and donated a boatload of money to the causes they offended (Umm…nope).

But while the ads may have been a disaster for Groupon, they highlight four important lessons for causes and the businesses that work with them.

Holy, Batman! This cause marketing stuff really works! The outrage against Groupon was immediate, loud and passionate. As Willy Wonka said, “Strike that. Reverse it.” Now imagine if Groupon had produced a great cause marketing ad and the raves it would have earned from viewers. Cause marketing is a powerful, meaningful strategy that enhances a company’s favorability–when it’s done well. When it’s not, it has an equally potent but negative impact.

Group buying sites can work for causes. There was a legitimate giving component to Groupon’s Superbowl spots but it wasn’t mentioned in the ads (Groupon offered to match donations to the causes they dissed). Also left out was that Groupon and other group buying sites can be used to help causes. Groupon and Living Social have worked with DonorsChoose.org to raise over $250,000. A recent post in Mashable reviewed seven group buying sites using daily deals to give back. And just this week I did a deeper dive on GoodTwo.com, a daily deal platform that lets causes and individual fundraisers combine commerce with contacts to raise cash.

Humor has a place in cause marketing. Tom Watson pointed this out in his wonderful post on the Groupon mess, and even the founder of Groupon has assured people that his company was just making fun of itself. The key is appropriate, non exploitative, positive and disruptive humor that flies in the face of the melodramatic pandering we see in most cause marketing. Some causes are trying to use humor well, while thers are reminding causes to laugh at themselves every now and then. Hopefully we’ll all get the message: humor for good is good.

The reason Groupon will survive is what you need to thrive in cause marketing. Groupon has a brand with the potential to join ranks with some of the best brands in the world (Starbucks, Mercedes, Nike, Apple, etc.). A strong brand is your most important asset in cause marketing. For cause or company, it’s like a magnet that draws people, money and influence closer, and, in difficult times, repels critics and controversy.

Take a top cause brand like Komen for the Cure that wields one of the strongest magnets in the cause world. They attract donors, celebrities and advocates in hoards who contribute marketing muscle and hundreds of millions to their fight. But last year when Komen got caught in the chicken coop with Kentucky Fried Chicken suddenly nothing stuck, and, despite waves of criticism, Komen weathered the storm well. Groupon and Komen demonstrate the power of brand and why we all need a powerful one.

And Groupon certainly has enough brand power to earn a pass on this Superbowl fumble. The rest of us shouldn’t spend a moment longer dissecting the replay. You need to get busy harnessing the power of cause marketing, the value of group buying sites and the disruptiveness of humor while building a brand that can play offense and defense.

Your goal should be to join Groupon one day in the big game of philanthropy, business and marketing. But unlike them, you’ll be winner.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...